Haha, tgray! I hear you! You could always get a 3.5 and then just drive like you’re in a hybrid! Just kidding - but seriously, you need to weigh the costs long-term.
1 Like
I’ve had my F-150 with the 2.7 EcoBoost for about 3 years now. It’s been great on gas but has had a couple of minor issues. Overall, I think about the long-term costs as well, especially regarding maintenance and repairs.
Have you found the costs of insurance to be different for the 2.7 versus the 3.5? I’m trying to figure out how much I’ll save in the long run.
The 3.5 EcoBoost does offer more power, but it’s also known for some more significant repair costs down the line. The turbo issues can get costly if they arise, so definitely something to consider.
3 Likes
That’s a good point! I’ve also heard that the resale value for the 3.5 might be better due to its towing capability. Has anyone looked into that?
Absolutely! From what I’ve seen, trucks with the 3.5 EcoBoost tend to hold their value pretty well. But, you have to weigh that against the potential repair costs. It’s a balancing act!
Totally get that! Can anyone share their experiences with insurance differences for both variants? That could impact the decision, too.
I’ve found the insurance for my 2.7 EcoBoost is a bit lower than my buddy’s 3.5. It seems like insurers factor in potential repair costs and performance capabilities, which makes sense. Definitely check with your insurer!
Thanks for the info, that’s really helpful! Now, considering my budget, I’m really torn - is the 3.5 more fun to drive, or is the 2.7 adequate?
Honestly, both are fun! The 2.7 feels peppy enough for everyday driving, and the 3.5 gives you that extra thrill. You just have to consider if that thrill is worth the extra buck in the long term!