Ford F-150 2.7 vs 3.5: Which EcoBoost Engine is Right for Me?

Car Reviews & Recommendations
1

I’m in the market for a Ford F-150 and am trying to make sense of the differences between the 2.7L and 3.5L EcoBoost engines. I’ve done some research, but I really want to hear from you guys who have experience with either or both of these engines.

Performance:

  • How does the power delivery feel in both engines during everyday driving vs. when towing?
  • Are there noticeable differences in acceleration and responsiveness?

Fuel Efficiency:

  • I’ve seen some claims about fuel economy, but how do they stack up in real-world driving conditions?
  • If you’re just cruising around town versus taking long trips, what differences have you observed?

Towing Capacity:

  • For those who tow frequently, how do each of these engines perform?
  • Is one significantly better than the other when it comes to hauling trailers or heavy loads?

General Suitability:

  • Which engine do you think is better for daily driving versus off-road adventures?
  • For those of you who have made the switch or had experiences with both, would you recommend one over the other?

Conclusion:

I’m looking for personal insights and opinions rather than just the specs. Ultimately, I want to choose the engine that will best fit my driving needs. Thanks in advance for your help!

2

The main difference between the 2.7L and the 3.5L EcoBoost lies in performance. The 3.5L offers 400 horsepower and 500 lb-ft of torque, compared to 325 horsepower and 400 lb-ft of torque from the 2.7L. If towing is a priority, the 3.5L is the better choice.

3

True, but remember that the 2.7L EcoBoost still has respectable towing capacity around 8,500 lbs. It might be enough for light-duty tasks. Plus, it’s more fuel-efficient for city driving.

4 Likes
4

I’ve got the 3.5L, and it’s a beast! Whether hauling equipment or just cruising, it feels powerful. Others have mentioned that the 2.7L isn’t far behind in normal driving scenarios, though.

5

That’s a good point! Does anyone feel that the smaller engine actually provides a more enjoyable driving experience because it’s lighter?

6

Absolutely! Both engines are turbocharged, so the 2.7L has quick acceleration for its size. The lighter weight can make it feel more responsive. Just depends on what you’re looking for in driving dynamics.

7

I’ve been reading some reviews, and it seems like the 3.5L is generally recommended for those needing higher towing capacities or carrying heavier loads. For everyday use, isn’t the 2.7L sufficient?

7 Likes
8

Yes! For daily commuting or short trips, the 2.7L can be quite adequate. It strikes a nice balance of power and efficiency without the heavier price tag of the 3.5L.

4 Likes
9

That’s what I was thinking too! But if I plan on towing a bigger trailer later on, wouldn’t it be better to invest in the 3.5L from the start? It’s always hard to predict future needs!

10

You might be right, paige46! The 3.5L gives more flexibility as your needs change. Plus, you won’t regret having more power when it’s needed. It’s like having insurance on a powerful truck!

11

Haha! That’s a great way to put it. Just be sure to also consider maintenance costs, as the bigger engine may have different needs down the line.

12

I’ve been looking into the fuel efficiency of both engines. The 2.7 EcoBoost is rated around 20 MPG city and 26 MPG highway, while the 3.5 hovers around 18 MPG city and 24 MPG highway. If fuel economy is your priority, the 2.7 is a solid pick.

13

True, but don’t forget the added power in the 3.5! It can handle heavier loads more comfortably, which could be a game-changer for some users.

14

I totally agree with nwells! I have a 2.7 and I’ve noticed great real-world mileage. I get about 21 MPG in mixed driving. Perfect for my daily commute and weekend trips!

15

Thanks for sharing your experience, jessica06! I’m considering a 3.5 mainly for towing. Do you think the MPG difference is significant enough to sway someone who tows often?

16

Kerry49, based on what I’ve read, if towing is a priority, you might want to go with the 3.5. It has more torque and can handle larger trailers better. The fuel efficiency drop might be worth it for the added capability.

17

I was skeptical about the 2.7’s power, but it surprised me! For everyday use and light towing, it’s actually very capable. I think it just depends on what you need it for.

18

You make a good point, mario66. It really boils down to personal driving needs. Are you primarily commuting, or do you expect to tow frequently?

1 Like
19

Exactly! I feel like deciding on the engine also means considering future needs. What about fuel prices? With high gas prices, the difference in MPG could really add up for some.

7 Likes
20

True, cguzman! That’s why I’m leaning towards the 2.7; my budget can’t deal with the potential fuel costs if I choose the 3.5. Every penny counts, right?